Seminars
HCCJ Seminar Series 2010-2011
| Date and time | Location | Speaker | Seminar title |
| 27 October 2010, 4-6pm | Heart of Campus, HO16 | Dr Emma Wincup, senior lecturer in criminology and criminal justice, and deputy director of the Centre For Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds | Bringing in the outsiders: drug policy, social reintegration and welfare reform |
more information...Bringing in the outsiders: drug policy, social reintegration and welfare reformThe 2008 drug strategy for England included among its four aims a commitment to delivering new approaches to reintegrating problem drug users back into society. In keeping with New Labour's attempt to promote social inclusion through participation in the labour market, the strategy paid especial attention to addressing worklessness in recognition of high levels of labour market inactivity among this group. The strategy made explicit that the benefits system should play a key role in promoting the social integration of this group and stated that a 'new regime' was necessary. In a series of policy documents leading up to the Welfare Act 2009, a series of measures were laid out for problem drug users which included the payment of a new benefit (a treatment allowance), access to drug treatment and access to employment support. At the same time, problem drug users were judged to be incapable of acknowledging their responsibilities to society and were deemed to need to 'discipline' of sanctions in order to change their behaviour and fulfil their obligations to society. The end result was the planned introduction of Welfare Reform Drug Recovery Pilots (in October 2010) which required problem drug users to attend a substance-related assessment, a treatment awareness programme and an additional support programme or face the loss of benefits. In June this year, plans for the pilots which were shelved by the coalition government but the consultation for a new drug policy to be launched in 2010 sought views on whether the benefit system should be used to tackle drug and alcohol dependency. This paper charts the development of the 'new regime' for problem drug users and considers the extent to which the various measures proposed might promote the social inclusion of problem drug users. |
|||
| 24 November 2010, 4-6pm | Heart of Campus HO16 | Chris Robinson, diversity governor, HMP Wakefield |
Developing and sustaining diversity research in a high security prison: a governor's perspective (working title) |
more information...Developing and sustaining diversity research in a high security prison: a governor's perspective (working title)This paper presents the perspective of a prison manager centrally involved in the development and delivery of an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded research project at HMP Wakefield. Key issues of developing trust of staff and prisoners; confidentiality and managing security issues, enabling prisoners and staff to speak freely and developing project credibility are explored. The dilemmas of opening a prison wing to external scrutiny for nine months are described particularly in the areas of as is the issue of the research report. The issue first raised by Becker (1967) and subsequently developed by Liebling (2001) of 'sides' in research is discussed. The paper concludes with a discussion of the impacts of this research on the prison and the wider prison estate. |
|||
| 26 January 2011, 4-6pm | Heart of Campus HO16 | Kevin Wong, Deputy Director Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University | Offender management for all - pipe dream or an affordable proposition? |
more information...Offender management for all - pipe dream or an affordable proposition?A future look at UK Government policy reflected in the Criminal Justice Green Paper (to be published in October 2010) but informed by the national evaluations (conducted by the Hallam Centre for Community Justice) of Integrated Offender Management, Intensive Alternatives to Custody and Layered Offender Management and Tiering in prison. |
|||
| 23 February 2011, 4-6pm | Heart of Campus HO16 | Dr Steve Riley, senior lecturer in law, Department of Law, Criminology and Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University | Values and crime: a scoping study |
more information...Values and crime: a scoping studyWhat are values and what is their relationship with crime? This paper identifies a range of ways in which values exist - inter alia, categorically, cognitively, and through character - and draws some limited conclusions about how different conceptions of value can be used to inform our understanding of both the structure of crime and responses to crime. The paper does not defend a theory of value but rather seeks to isolate the means by which values are generated or discovered; it considers the ways in which these preliminary and foundational conceptions of value encourage or dissuade us from adopting certain views of crime. As such, the paper seeks to outline normative and axiological questions that are not only prior to policy and practice but also prior to the disciplinary division of labour between law and criminology. |
|||
| 23 March 2011, 4-6pm | TBC | Dr Carla Reeves, senior lecturer in criminology, Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield | Ageplay in Second Life: support to what? |
more information...Ageplay in Second Life: support to what?Second Life is a virtual massively multi-player online game (MMOG) established in 2003. It is an adult-only, free-form computer generated environment in which users, through their avatars (animated characters), act out a life not unlike they would in the real world, except that in Second Life there are no physical laws and they are not bounded by issues such as employment, social networks or status. As such, this ostensibly anonymous environment allows users freedom to act in ways which they may feel unable to in the real world; perhaps acting out fantasies or role playing different avatars. The practice of an adult user creating and operating as a child avatar is referred to as 'ageplay'. Ageplay is a contentious issue within Second Life as many users engaging in ageplay simulate sexual activity between child and adult avatars. Ageplay has become a topic of concern because police investigators have assumed a link between ageplay and the increase in risk that ageplayers will commit real world child abuse offences. But what evidence is there to show that activity such as ageplay is worrisome? This discussion centres around a number of propositions. The first, that ageplay may act to reduce the likelihood of real-world offending through a cathartic process. The second proposition argues that activities such as ageplay support pro-offending attitudes and provide a forum in which advice can be sought on committing real-world child abuse. Both of these propositions have been argued in respect to the use and distribution of child abuse images as well as to online forums such as paedophiliac chatrooms, where most research in this field has been undertaken. The arguments here will be expanded to consider the unique environment of Second Life which combines elements of both the use of child abuse images and online networking and adds an additional dimension to the equation: that of role-playing fantasies. |
|||
| Cancelled | Heart of Campus HO16 | Dr Craig Paterson, senior lecturer in criminology, and Dr Ed Pollock, senior lecturer in criminology, Department of Law, Criminology and Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University | Tales of the unexpected - ethics, values and 'common-sense policing' |
more information...Tales of the unexpected - ethics, values and 'common-sense policing'Since the 1970s, numerous attempts have been made by police forces across the globe to professionalise police behaviour. One crucial aspect of this has involved a shift from 'police training' to 'police education' in order to, amongst other aims, assist the development of a more flexible, open-minded value system amongst police officers. Industry publications such as 'Police Review' have presented an argument from police officers that there is not a natural fit between a university education and police knowledge. Underpinning this perspective is a presumption that police 'values' are different to the 'values' promoted by a university education and a belief that a university is not the ideal place to engender 'common-sense'. This paper analyses the potential for a clash of these value bases and evaluates the evidence-base that lies at the crux of the police education debate. In so doing, the paper reports the findings of a small-scale study conducted by the authors' with a small number of Sheffield Hallam University students who were required to 'test' this contrasting value base through their work as Special Police Constables undertaken as part of their BA (Hons) Criminology degree course during 2009/10. |
|||
HCCJ Seminar Series 2009-2010
| Date and time | Location | Speaker | Seminar title |
| 14 October 2009 3 - 5pm |
The Mews, N205 | Paula Hamilton, senior lecturer in criminology and community justice, Hallam Centre for Community Justice | Probationers stories of desistance - desistance and rehabilitative efforts |
more information...Probationers stories of desistance - desistance and rehabilitative efforts |
|||
| 11 November 2009 2 - 4pm |
Heart of Campus HO16 | Malcolm Cowburn, Hallam Centre for Community Justice and Victoria Lavis, Centre for Psychology Studies, University of Bradford | Using a Prisoner Advisory group to develop diversity research in a maximum-security prison: some initial observations |
more information...Using a Prisoner Advisory group to develop diversity research in a maximum-security prison: some initial observations |
|||
| 13 January 2010 2 - 4pm |
The Mews, N205 | Marian Duggan, lecturer in criminology, Sheffield Hallam University | Theorising Homophobic Violence in Northern Ireland |
more information...Theorising Homophobic Violence in Northern Ireland |
|||
| 10 February 2010 2 - 4pm |
Heart of Campus HO16 | Dr Muzammil Quraishi, senior lecturer in criminology and criminal justice, University of Salford | Religion and Social Control - The Case of Muslim Ex-Offenders |
more information...Religion and Social Control - The Case of Muslim Ex-Offenders • provide an analysis of the awareness and significance of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and uqūbāt (Islamic criminal law) amongst Muslim ex-offenders • provide a specific focus on ex-offenders who have converted to Islam and how their post-incarceration experiences compare to those 'born into the faith' • document and critique experiences of discrimination, victimisation and exclusion amongst Muslim ex-offenders and in turn identify gaps in provision • evaluate perceptions of radicalisation and extremism amongst Muslim ex-offenders |
|||
| 10 March 2010 2 - 4pm |
Heart of Campus HO16 | Dr Maggie Wykes, senior lecturer in criminology, University of Sheffield | Bringing the boys back: re-engendering criminology |
more information...Bringing the boys back: re-engendering criminology |
|||
| 14 April 2010 2 - 4pm |
The Mews, N205 | Professor Paul Senior, director of Hallam Centre for Community Justice, Sheffield Hallam University (provisional booking) | Integrated Offender Management |
HCCJ Seminar Series 2008-2009
26 November 2008
Paula Hamilton (Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University)
Desistance and Probation
Over recent years a growing body of work has emerged which aims to further our understanding of how and why people desist from crime. However relatively little attention has been paid to any relationship between (community) probation supervision and desistance and probation policy and practice themselves remain relatively untouched by insights from the desistance literature. This may be at least partly due to the emphasis in the literature on the 'spontaneous' or self motivated nature of desistance (Maruna 2001); the two most influential schools of thought being that offenders simply 'grow out of crime' or that desistance is bound up with socio-structural factors and the accumulation of social capital or social bonds. Studies which have understood desistance in these terms e.g. Rex (1999) and Farrell (2002) have concluded that probation supervision has only a limited or indirect influence on desistance.
However, a recent body of work has highlighted the role of internal cognitive changes in the process of desistance e.g. Gove, 1985, Maruna, 1997, 2001; Giordano et al, 2002). The findings of this work have resonance with contemporary probation practice currently influenced by the findings of the commonly known 'What Works' research, which has similarly highlighted the role of offender's cognitions and thinking styles.
This study aims to explore the relationship (actual or potential) between contemporary 'What Works?' based supervision and desistance where desistance is understood from a phenomenological perspective. It therefore aims to achieve a 'marriage' of the two research agendas as proposed by Maruna (2001) where lessons from `What Works` research at the 'macro' level of offender rehabilitation are integrated with `individual level` accounts of change processes involved in desistance. The background, rationale and methodology for the study will be outlined and comments invited.
28 January 2009
Dr Liz Austen (Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University)
The Social Construction of Risk by Young People
The purpose of this seminar paper is to provide a critical analysis of a widely accepted risk discourse. This discussion presents a range of data which aims to highlight weaknesses in the widespread application of the 'Risk Society' thesis (Beck 1992) to specific contexts; in this case, the lives of young people. This selection of quantitative and qualitative data, taken from a school based case study, is juxtaposed against theoretical reasoning.
Three main assumptions made by the 'Risk Society' thesis are critiqued using this empirical data
- risk is a negative concept
- risk is aligned with uncertainty and worry
- those living in the 'Risk Society' have become sceptical of expert opinions
By stimulating this debate it becomes clear that each of these individual criticisms need further research. A more detailed discussion is beyond the scope of the data collected in this study. Rather this data will be thematically presented in relation to the theoretical assumption under which is was collected. The conclusion will suggest that by using pockets of mixed methodology an argument can be presented for the reconsideration of such extensive acceptance of the 'Risk Society' thesis. This discussion provides a platform for future empirical work which would look to strengthen the social constructionist framework involved in an appreciation of risk, moving away from the recent trend in grand risk theorising, to context specific data collection and explanation. It is hoped that discussions can be channelled around the practical application of these findings.
25 February 2009
Dr Sunita Toor (Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University)
'It's a Shameful Affair' The Role and Impact of Honour and Shame on British Asian Girls and their Criminality
The paper examines how 'shame' (sharam) and 'honour' (izzat) determines the nature and experience of criminality, punishment and criminal justice of British Asian females who offend. The paper draws upon biographical research undertaken with British born Asian female offenders aged 15 to 18. The paper highlights how shame and (dis)honour exacerbates the experience of 'punishment' of British Asian female offenders as they are subjected to cultural, familial, community as well as criminal justice punishments.
25 March 2009
Dr Marilyn Gregory (Sociological Studies, Sheffield University)
Reflection and Resistance Probation Practice and the Ethic of Care
The presentation is based upon the presenter's PhD study which was completed in 2007, probation's centenary year. The Probation Service is an organisation that has undergone a tremendous journey of change and transition since its inception as a morally-underpinned voluntary body whose members sought to save the souls of poor unfortunates appearing before the courts. The study includes a critical history of probation practice, examining the development of practice during its 100 years. Probation's transition, which is only touched upon very briefly in this presentation, is considered as it is experienced by the author herself and also by 15 long-serving probation officers with whom she has conducted qualitative interviews. All 16 people were trained in what is termed a 'clinical mode' of practice in which probation officers were able to practice as social workers, employing social work values embodying an ethic of care.
The practice environment has changed in the decades since they trained into what is termed a 'punitive managerial mode' in which the ethic of care has been overshadowed by the ethic of justice. In this presentation I will focus upon practitioners' experiences and how they respond to their changing circumstances. Experienced practitioners with well established skills of reflection and critical thinking, the study's participants do not readily adopt a strictly prescribed form of practice in which a technical solution is routinely applied to groups or individuals. Instead they develop a form of subjectivity in which they continue to view themselves as social workers. They are able to take a critical position and sustain their resistance to a form of practice which ignores the social context of offenders' lives. A view of practice emerges in which it is a practical-moral activity; a form of human action based on relationships between the helper and the helped, in which decision making is indeterminate and reflexive, and in which solutions to problems are created reflexively in a positive working relationship between practitioner and client. Professional practice involving a relationship between human beings is not something that can be reduced to the straightforward application of technique. Practice has a moral character which is suffused with judgement and reflection upon the unique and particular circumstances of the individual to be helped, with an intention to do good. It involves not only an understanding of the circumstances of the helped person, but self knowledge on the part of the helper that is developed with each encounter.
The presentation ends with the study's conclusion that there are already developing possibilities for a form of practice which encompasses both justice and care, which can be found in recent work on constructive practice with offenders and the desistance paradigm of offender management.
27 May 2009
Dr Victoria Lavis (Centre for Psychology Studies, University of Bradford)
Duplicity and integrity: ethics and researcher identity in the practice of qualitative interviewing
Drawing on Coffey's (1991) notion of fieldwork as 'identity work' the paper explores the ethical implications of constructing and performing different 'researcher identities' within the commitment to feminist research as a moral enterprise. In doing so it draws on three examples taken from research which employed a discursive approach informed by feminist research principles to explore issues of power, knowledge and language on the health services response to women experiencing domestic violence. These examples illustrate how within qualitative in-depth interviews identities can be both constructed by (Wolf, 1996) and required of the researcher by their participants (Thapar-Björkert and Henry, 2004). Whilst such researcher identities can be viewed within feminist research as being responsive to the individual needs of specific participants, they can leave the researcher with the experience of feeling 'duplicitous'. The paper explores some of the tensions inherent within these two vantage-points and calls for a wider engagement and discussion of these issues in order to enable researchers to negotiate such tensions with integrity.



